The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted Rodney Reed an indefinite stay of execution on November 15, just five days before he was scheduled to be executed.
Rodney was wrongfully convicted in 1998 for the murder of Stacey Stites in Bastrop, Texas. But he now has another chance to prove his innocence.
In the coming months, new witnesses will testify on Rodney’s behalf during a week-long hearing and new, mounting evidence that points to his innocence and implicates the murder victim’s fiancé, Jimmy Fennell, will be presented.
People across the country called for justice for Rodney.
But the fight’s not over. Rodney still needs your support.
Despite being granted a stay of execution, Rodney remains confined to a 60-square-foot cell for 23 hours a day with only a small slit for a window. He has not been able to embrace his family in more than 22 years.
But before he was wrongfully convicted, Rodney was a son, brother, and father. He was a person with dreams. Here’s what you need to know about Rodney.
Rodney Rodell Reed was born in California on December 22, 1967, to Sandra, a nurse, and Walter, a member of the U.S. Air Force.
In high school, Rodney was on the football team, but had dreams of becoming a professional boxer.
Rodney’s dreams of becoming a boxer were not realized. In the early 1990s he moved to Bastrop, Texas and life took a turn for the worse.
In 1996, Stacey Stites was murdered in Bastrop and investigators aggressively interrogated her fiancé Jimmy Fennell, a local police officer. Jimmy was found to be deceptive on multiple polygraph tests.
Nearly a year later, a small amount of Rodney’s semen was found in Stacey’s body, which led investigators to connect him to the crime.
Rodney maintained that he did not kill Stacey, with whom he’d had a private, consensual relationship.
But in 1998, Rodney was convicted and sentenced to death. The decision was based almost entirely on expert opinion that falsely claimed that the semen found in Stacey’s body had to have been from a sexual encounter that occurred at or around the same time as the murder, thus implicating Rodney in her death. However, this testimony was false and the evidence is actually more consistent with Rodney’s account of a consensual encounter the day before Stacey’s disappearance.